(HC) Barton v. Gastelo

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/19/22 DISREGARDING 15 petitioner's 09/09/22 filing. Petitioner is advised that any further documents filed in this action will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WILLIAM BARTON,

12

No. 2:22-cv-0932 WBS KJN P

Petitioner,

13

v.

14

ORDER

JOSIE GASTELO,

15

Respondents.

16
This petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed on August 15, 2022. On September

17
18

9, 2022, petitioner filed a second amended petition. However, petitioner again challenges his

19

1976 conviction, and continues to challenge such conviction in this court despite findings that his

20

challenges are time-barred and duplicative. 1 Because judgment was entered and the court

21

declined to issue a certificate of appealability, no further action on petitioner’s filing is required.

22

Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s September 9, 2022 filing (ECF No. 15) is

23

////

24

////

25

////

26

////

27
28

1

For example, in Barton v. Costelo, No. 2:22-cv-0904 KJM JDP (E.D. Cal. July 29, 2022), the
magistrate judge recommended that the petition be dismissed as time barred. Id. (ECF No. 10.)
1

1

disregarded. Petitioner is advised that any further documents filed in this action will be

2

disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

3

Dated: September 19, 2022

4
5
6
7

bart0932.158

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2