(PC) Foster v. Ramirez

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/18/22 ADOPTING in full 7 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING without prejudice for lack of prosecution. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DEEARL FOSTER,

12
13
14

No. 2:22-cv-1064 WBS AC P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

ALDANA RAMIREZ,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking

18

relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

19

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On August 18, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has

23

not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and

25

recommendations was returned to the court on September 6, 2022, plaintiff was properly served.

26

It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times.

27

Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully

28

effective.
1

1

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

3

ORDERED that:

4
5
6
7

1. The findings and recommendations issued August 18, 2022 (ECF No. 7), are
ADOPTED in full, and
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution..
Dated: November 18, 2022

8
9
10
11
12
13

fost1064.802

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2