Olfati v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 10

ORDER SETTING INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 07/29/222 SETTING Initial Scheduling Conference for 9/8/2022 at 10:00 AM conducted remotely via Zoom before Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson (Zoom invitation will be distributed one week prior) with status reports due 14 days prior to the conference. The parties shall complete and file the Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment form within 7 days. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

PARVIN OLFATI,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 2:22-cv-01127-JDP
ORDER SETTING INITIAL SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE

v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, it is hereby ORDERED that:

18

1. An initial scheduling conference is set for September 8, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The

19
20
21

conference will be conducted remotely via Zoom.1
2. No later than fourteen days prior to the scheduling conference, the parties shall file
status reports that address the following:2
a. the factual and legal contentions set forth in the parties’ pleadings, briefly

22
23

summarized;

24

b. possible joinder of additional parties;

25

c. expected amendment of pleadings and, if applicable, a proposed deadline for

26
27
28

such amendment;
1
2

The Zoom invitation will be distributed one week prior to the scheduling conference.
The parties are encouraged to file a joint status report.
1

1

d. jurisdiction and venue;

2

e. anticipated motions and their scheduling;

3

f. a proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including deadlines for

4

exchanging initial disclosures and for disclosing expert witnesses;

5
6

g. proposed cutoff dates for completing discovery and dispositive motions, and
dates for the pretrial conference and trial;3

7
8

h. any proposed changes to the limits on discovery imposed by the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure;

9

i. estimated trial length;

10

j. whether the case is related to any other cases, including any bankruptcy cases;

11

k. whether an early settlement conference should be scheduled at the initial

12

scheduling conference;

13

l. whether counsel will stipulate to the undersigned acting as the settlement judge

14

and waive disqualification from so acting, or whether they prefer to have a different magistrate

15

judge conduct a settlement; and

16
17

m. any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this
matter.

18

3. The parties are hereby notified that failure to obey federal or local rules, or any order

19

of this court, “may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by

20

statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court,” including dismissal. E.D. Cal. L.R.

21

110.

22
23

4. Counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of any
settlement or other disposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 160.

24
25
26
27
28

3

The parties are advised that Judge Peterson generally requires that: (1) expert disclosures
be completed before the close of fact discovery; (2) all motions to compel discovery be heard
approximately thirty days before the close of discovery; (3) all dispositive motions be heard
within approximately ninety days of the discovery completion date; (4) a final pretrial conference
be held approximately ninety days after the deadline for hearing non-discovery motions; and (5)
trial commence approximately ninety days after the final pretrial conference.
2

1
2
3

5. Within seven days of the date of this order, the parties shall complete and file the
Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment form.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
Dated:
7
8

July 29, 2022
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3