(PC) DeOllas v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/29/2022 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. The sufficiency of 1 Complaint and service thereof will be addressed separately. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY EUGENE DeOLLAS, II, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:22-CV-1280-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 See ECF No. 2. Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is, therefore, granted. The sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint and service thereof will be addressed 22 23 24 25 separately. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 29, 2022 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?