(SS) Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/17/2022 ORDERING that Plaintiff to file his consent or decline form no later than 12/2/2022. Failure to do so may be grounds for sanctions.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FRANK CLARK.,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:22-cv-01336-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff is proceeding with counsel in this social security action. On July 28, 2022,
19
plaintiff was served with a scheduling order and a Consent or Decline form regarding magistrate
20
judge jurisdiction, which he was directed to file by October 31, 2022. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff did
21
not file the form indicating whether he consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.
22
The court informs plaintiff that consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction is not required
23
but is the general practice for social security cases in the Eastern District of California. In this
24
district, Magistrate Judges are most familiar with Social Security cases and the applicable law.
25
Consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction enables the Magistrate Judge to rule directly on the case,
26
which prevents delay. If plaintiff chooses to decline Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, this case will
27
be assigned to a District Judge. In that case, the matter will likely be referred to the Magistrate
28
Judge for preparation of findings and recommendations, which will then be sent to the district
1
2
3
judge for a final order after a period of time for objections from either party.
Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his consent or decline form no later than December 2, 2022.
Failure to do so may be grounds for sanctions.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED: November 17, 2022
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?