(PC) Israel v. Negrete
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 09/24/24 ADOPTING 22 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 20 21 Motions for Default Judgment. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AKIVA A. ISRAEL,
12
13
14
No. 2:22-cv-01391-TLN-CSK
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ROBERT NEGRETE,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 18, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On August 12, 2024,
23
Plaintiff was granted an additional 21 days to file objections. (ECF No. 25.) That time has
24
passed, and Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
27
ORDERED that:
28
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 22) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
1
1
2
3
4
2. Plaintiff’s third and fourth motions for default judgment (ECF Nos. 20, 21) are
DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: September 24, 2024
5
6
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?