(PC) Gutierrez v. Reyersbach et al

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/6/2024 GRANTING defendant's 24 motion to opt out of Post-Screening ADR Project and LIFTING the stay initiated on 11/27/2023. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11
12
UBALDO MIO GUTIERREZ,
13

2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP
Plaintiff, [Proposed] ORDER re: Def.’s Mot. to Opt
Out of the Post-Screening ADR

14
v.
15
16

P. REYERSBACH, ET AL.

17

Defendants.

18
19

Plaintiff Guterrez, an inmate proceeding pro se and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claims that

20

Defendant Pantoja violated his constitutional rights for an incident that allegedly occurred at

21

California State Prison – Folsom.

22

On November 27, 2023, the Court issued an order referring the case to its Post-Screening

23

ADR Project and staying the action for a period of 120 days. (ECF No. 23.) After investigating

24

Plaintiff’s claims, Defendant moved to opt out of the Post-Screening ADR Project on grounds

25

that a settlement conference would not be beneficial at this time.

26
27
28
1
[Proposed] ORDER re: Def.’s Mot. to Opt Out of the Post-Screening ADR (2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP)

1
2

Good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Opt Out of the
Post-Screening ADR Project and LIFTS the stay initiated on November 27, 2023.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
Dated:

February 6, 2024

6

JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[Proposed] ORDER re: Def.’s Mot. to Opt Out of the Post-Screening ADR (2:22-cv-01492-TLN-JDP)