(PS) Trotter v. Sacramento Housing Program et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/17/23 ADOPTING in full 6 Findings and Recommendations. Leave to amend is WITHDRAWN. Plaintiff's claims stated in 1 the complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
Case 2:22-cv-01552-KJM-KJN Document 7 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CUPID MONIQUE TROTTER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:22–cv–1552–KJM–KJN PS
ORDER
(ECF No. 6.)
v.
SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al.,
Defendants.
16
On November 15, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF
17
18
No. 6), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the
19
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were
20
filed.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
21
22
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
23
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
24
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
25
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
Case 2:22-cv-01552-KJM-KJN Document 7 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 6) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
3
2. Leave to amend is WITHDRAWN;
4
3. Plaintiff’s claims stated in the complaint (ECF No. 1) are DISMISSED WITH
5
6
7
PREJUDICE; and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case
DATED: January 17, 2023
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?