(PS) Trotter v. Sacramento Housing Program et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/17/23 ADOPTING in full 6 Findings and Recommendations. Leave to amend is WITHDRAWN. Plaintiff's claims stated in 1 the complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Case 2:22-cv-01552-KJM-KJN Document 7 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CUPID MONIQUE TROTTER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:22–cv–1552–KJM–KJN PS
ORDER
(ECF No. 6.)

v.
SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al.,
Defendants.

16

On November 15, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF

17
18

No. 6), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

19

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were

20

filed.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,

21
22

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed

23

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law

24

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court

25

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

26

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

27

/////

28

/////
1

Case 2:22-cv-01552-KJM-KJN Document 7 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2
1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 6) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

3

2. Leave to amend is WITHDRAWN;

4

3. Plaintiff’s claims stated in the complaint (ECF No. 1) are DISMISSED WITH

5
6
7

PREJUDICE; and
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case
DATED: January 17, 2023

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2