(PC)Robinson v. Jones et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/17/2022 ADOPTING the 14 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Spichka, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAVAUGHN K. ROBINSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

TY JONES, et al.,

15

No. 2:22-cv-01640-DAD-KJN (PC)

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
THIS ACTION
Defendants.

(Doc. No. 14)

16
17

Plaintiff Javaughn K. Robinson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights

18

action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On November 1, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and

21

recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed because it is duplicative of

22

Robinson v. Jones, 2:22-cv-1717-KJM-CKD, a prior civil rights action filed by plaintiff that

23

remains pending in this court. (Doc. No. 14.) The pending findings and recommendations were

24

served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within

25

fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 2.) On November 10, 2022, plaintiff filed a document

26

captioned “Objections,” but in substance, plaintiff states therein that he requests that this action

27

be dismissed and advises that he will not make any further filings in this case. (Doc. No. 15.)

28

Thus, it is clear that plaintiff does not object to the pending findings and recommendations.
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

2

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including plaintiff’s filing

3

dated November 10, 2022, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by

4

the record and by proper analysis.

5

Accordingly,

6

1.

7

The findings and recommendations issued on November 1, 2022 (Doc. No. 14) are
adopted in full;

8

2.

This action is dismissed; and

9

3.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 17, 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2