(PC) Quang v. Alamosa et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/07/2024 ADOPTING 20 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Nair, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

THANH QUANG,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:22-cv-01704-DAD-DMC (PC)

Plaintiff,
v.
S. ALAMOSA, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
THIS ACTION
(Doc. No. 20)

16
17

Plaintiff Thanh Quang is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this

18

civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United

19

States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On March 7, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations

21

recommending this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to comply

22

with a court order and failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. No. 20.) Specifically, plaintiff has

23

failed to comply with the court’s order dated January 25, 2024, in which plaintiff’s first amended

24

complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was directed to file a second amended complaint within

25

thirty days. (Doc. No. 19.)

26

The pending findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice

27

that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Doc. No. 20

28

at 2.) To date, no objections have been filed, and the time in which to do so has passed.
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

2

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the

3

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly:

5

1.

6

adopted in full;

7

2.

8

This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to comply
with a court order and failure to prosecute this action; and

9

3.

10
11

The findings and recommendations issued on March 7, 2024 (Doc. No. 20) are

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 7, 2024
DALE A. DROZD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2