McGechie v. Atomos Limited et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/21/2022 EXTENDING deadlines such that plaintiff's opposition is due on 12/8/2022 with defendant's reply due by 12/19/2022. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 DAVID A. LOWE (SBN: 178811) dal@rezlaw.com 2 MICHELLE G. LEE (SBN: 266167) mgl@rezlaw.com 3 ZOЁ DEGEER (SBN: 298698) 4 zrd@rezlaw.com RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, LLP 5 351 California Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94104 6 Telephone: (415) 434-9800 Facsimile: (415) 434-0513 7 PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com 351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE  LLP 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff ESTELLE MCGECHIE 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 ESTELLE MCGECHIE, Case No. 2:22-cv-01812-TLN-DB 14 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION AND DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO ATOMOS LIMITED'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS 15 Plaintiff, vs. 16 ATOMOS LIMITED, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 / 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB 1 STIPULATION 2 WHEREAS on November 14, 2022, Defendant Atomos Limited filed a Motion to 3 Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens; 4 WHEREAS on November 15, 2022, the Court entered a Minute Order stating that, “On 5 the Court’s own motion, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens 6 (ECF No. [11]) is hereby submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 7 12/15/22 is VACATED;” 8 WHEREAS the Court in its Minute Order further stated that “Plaintiff shall file an 9 opposition or statement of non-opposition pursuant to Amended Local Rule 230(c), and PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com 351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE  LLP 10 Defendant may file a reply brief in accordance with Amended Local Rule 230(d)”; 11 WHEREAS pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) and (d), the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition 12 was November 28, 2022, and for Defendant’s reply was December 8, 2022; 13 WHEREAS the parties agreed to extend these deadlines given the Thanksgiving holiday 14 and time necessary to address the issues presented in Defendant’s motion; 15 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record, stipulate and request 16 that the Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to the motion to December 8, 17 2022, and for Defendant to file a reply to December 19, 2022. 18 DATED: November 18, 2022 Respectfully submitted, 19 RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, LLP 20 By: /s/ Michelle G. Lee MICHELLE G. LEE Attorneys for Plaintiff Estelle McGechie 21 22 23 DATED: November 18, 2022 HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP 24 By: /s/ Jesse D. Sutz JESSE D. SUTZ Attorneys for Defendant Atomos Limited 25 26 27 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB 1 2 3 4 ECF ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories thereto. Executed this 18th day of November 2022, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Michelle G. Lee MICHELLE G. LEE 5 6 7 8 9 PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com 351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE  LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB ORDER 1 2 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and their request for extension 3 of time, hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than December 8, 2022, 4 and Defendant shall file a reply no later than December 19, 2022. 5 6 DATED: November 21, 2022 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com 351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104 RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE  LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENSION OF TIME CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?