McGechie v. Atomos Limited et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/21/2022 EXTENDING deadlines such that plaintiff's opposition is due on 12/8/2022 with defendant's reply due by 12/19/2022. (Coll, A)
1 DAVID A. LOWE (SBN: 178811)
dal@rezlaw.com
2 MICHELLE G. LEE (SBN: 266167)
mgl@rezlaw.com
3
ZOЁ DEGEER (SBN: 298698)
4 zrd@rezlaw.com
RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, LLP
5 351 California Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, CA 94104
6 Telephone: (415) 434-9800
Facsimile: (415) 434-0513
7
PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com
351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff
ESTELLE MCGECHIE
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13 ESTELLE MCGECHIE,
Case No. 2:22-cv-01812-TLN-DB
14
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION AND
DEFENDANT’S REPLY TO ATOMOS
LIMITED'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR
FORUM NON CONVENIENS
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
16 ATOMOS LIMITED, DOES 1 through 20,
inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
/
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB
1
STIPULATION
2
WHEREAS on November 14, 2022, Defendant Atomos Limited filed a Motion to
3 Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens;
4
WHEREAS on November 15, 2022, the Court entered a Minute Order stating that, “On
5 the Court’s own motion, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Forum Non Conveniens
6 (ECF No. [11]) is hereby submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for
7 12/15/22 is VACATED;”
8
WHEREAS the Court in its Minute Order further stated that “Plaintiff shall file an
9 opposition or statement of non-opposition pursuant to Amended Local Rule 230(c), and
PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com
351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP
10 Defendant may file a reply brief in accordance with Amended Local Rule 230(d)”;
11
WHEREAS pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) and (d), the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition
12 was November 28, 2022, and for Defendant’s reply was December 8, 2022;
13
WHEREAS the parties agreed to extend these deadlines given the Thanksgiving holiday
14 and time necessary to address the issues presented in Defendant’s motion;
15
NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel of record, stipulate and request
16 that the Court extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file an opposition to the motion to December 8,
17 2022, and for Defendant to file a reply to December 19, 2022.
18 DATED: November 18, 2022
Respectfully submitted,
19
RUDY, EXELROD, ZIEFF & LOWE, LLP
20
By: /s/ Michelle G. Lee
MICHELLE G. LEE
Attorneys for Plaintiff Estelle McGechie
21
22
23 DATED: November 18, 2022
HIRSCHFELD KRAEMER LLP
24
By: /s/ Jesse D. Sutz
JESSE D. SUTZ
Attorneys for Defendant Atomos Limited
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB
1
2
3
4
ECF ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of the other signatories thereto.
Executed this 18th day of November 2022, at San Francisco, California.
/s/ Michelle G. Lee
MICHELLE G. LEE
5
6
7
8
9
PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com
351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB
ORDER
1
2
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and their request for extension
3 of time, hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff shall file an opposition no later than December 8, 2022,
4 and Defendant shall file a reply no later than December 19, 2022.
5
6
DATED: November 21, 2022
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
PH (415) 434-9800 | FX (415) 434-0513 | www.rezlaw.com
351 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 700
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94104
RUDY EXELROD ZIEFF & LOWE LLP
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENSION OF TIME
CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01812-TLN-DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?