Fisher et al v. Oroville Hospital

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/2/2025 DISMISSING this case was prejudice to the United States and California as to the Covered Conduct consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, without prejudice to the United States and California as to all other allegations in the Complaint, and with prejudice to Relator Fisher as to all claims asserted. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk AMW)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. CRAIG FISHER, 6 Plaintiffs, 7 v. 8 OROVILLE HOSPITAL, 9 Defendant. Case No. 2:22-cv-01829-JAM-SCR ORDER 10 11 ORDER 12 13 Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure the Plaintiff-Relators filed 14 a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Upon consideration of the Notice and the filings docketed in 15 this action, 16 17 18 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This case is dismissed with prejudice to the United States and California as to the 19 Covered Conduct consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and without prejudice to 20 the United States and California as to all other allegations in the Complaint; 21 22 23 2. This case is dismissed with prejudice to Relator Fisher as to all claims asserted in the above captioned case. 24 As all claims are now dismissed, this case shall be closed. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: January 2, 2025 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ORDER 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?