(PC) Fisher v. Galyen et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/4/2025 DENYING 49 Motion for a Settlement Conference. The stay is LIFTED. Defendants are DIRECTED to file a response to plaintiff's complaint within 21 days of this order's issuance. (Deputy Clerk HAH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AL GENE FISHER, JR., 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 GALYEN, et al., 14 Case No. 2:22-cv-1952-TLN-JDP (P) ORDER Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion asking that this case be set for a settlement conference. ECF 17 No. 49. I have reviewed the docket and believe that at this time a settlement conference would be 18 unlikely to be productive. Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to set a settlement conference is denied 19 without prejudice. If plaintiff still believes that a settlement conference would be beneficial after 20 the court issues a decision on any forthcoming dispositive motions, he may renew this request. 21 Additionally, I will lift the stay issued on July 30, 2024, and direct defendants to file a 22 response to the complaint within twenty-one days. 23 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion for a settlement conference, ECF No. 49, is DENIED. 25 2. The stay issued on July 30, 2024, ECF No. 39, is LIFTED. 26 3. Defendants are directed to file a response to plaintiff’s complaint within twenty-one 27 28 days of this order’s issuance. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: March 4, 2025 4 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?