NY Life Ins. Co. v. Begashaw, et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/23/24 ADOPTING 42 Findings and Recommendations in full and GRANTING 24 Motion for Default Judgment and default judgment is entered against defendant Begashaw. The entry of default judgment, however, is not construed as a determination of the rightful beneficiary to the death benefit. (Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 2:22-cv-02081-KJM-JDP ORDER MICHAEL BEGASHAW & ENDALE TESSEMA, 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment was submitted for decision without oral 18 19 argument by the magistrate judge. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as 20 provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On August 20, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 21 22 contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 23 filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 24 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 28 ///// 1 1 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 20, 2024, are adopted in full; 5 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 24, is granted and default judgment is 6 entered against defendant Begashaw. The entry of default judgment, however, is not construed as 7 a determination of the rightful beneficiary to the death benefit; 8 3. Plaintiff is discharged from any and all liability to defendant Begashaw regarding the 9 life insurance policy issued to Mariamawit Tessema and the death benefit under the policy; and 10 4. Defendant Begashaw is permanently enjoined from bringing any action or proceeding 11 in any forum against plaintiff relating to the life insurance policy issued to Mariamawit 12 Tessema’s or the death benefit under the policy. 13 DATED: October 23. 2024. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?