(PC) Williams v. Mule Creek State Prison
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 01/19/23 ORDERING that plaintiff may DISREGARD #9 12/30/22 Order to the extent it ordered plaintiff to file a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis which have now been docketed. Plaintiff shall mail all further filings for this case to the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division, at 501 I St # 4200, Sacramento, CA 95814. (Benson, A.)
Case 2:22-cv-02103-DB Document 13 Filed 01/19/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEPHEN LAMONT WILLIAMS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:22-cv-2103 DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MULE CREEK STATE PRISON,
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se in this civil action. On December 30, 2022, the
19
court noted plaintiff had not properly commenced this civil action as required by Rule 3 of the
20
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 9.) By written order of the same date, the court
21
ordered plaintiff to (1) file a complaint and (2) either pay the required filing fee or file an
22
application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
23
Subsequent to the filing and service of the court’s order dated December 30, 2022,
24
however, plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis were docketed. Plaintiff’s
25
complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis had been received at the Fresno courthouse,
26
and then scanned and forwarded to the Sacramento courthouse, resulting in a delay the docketing
27
of those filings. Because these filings have been received and docketed, plaintiff may disregard
28
the court’s December 30, 2022 order to the extent it ordered him to file a complaint and motion to
1
Case 2:22-cv-02103-DB Document 13 Filed 01/19/23 Page 2 of 2
1
proceed in forma pauperis. In due course, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be
2
reviewed, and plaintiff’s complaint will be screened.
3
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. Plaintiff may disregard the court’s order filed and served on December 30, 2022, to the
5
extent it ordered plaintiff to file a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis which have
6
now been docketed.
7
2. Plaintiff shall mail all further filings for this case to the Eastern District of California,
8
Sacramento Division, at 501 I St # 4200, Sacramento, CA 95814.
9
Dated: January 19, 2023
10
11
12
DLB7
will2103.disregardorder
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?