(SS) Venkaiya v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/6/2024 ADOPTING 15 The Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTING 13 The Commissioner's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
REGINALD VENKAIYA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:22-cv-2189-MCE-KJN
ORDER
(ECF Nos. 9, 13, 15.)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
16
On October 18, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No.
17
18
15), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the
19
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were
20
filed. Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
21
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
22
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
23
1983).
24
The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
25
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly,
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 15) are ADOPTED in full;
28
2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 9) is DENIED;
1
1
3. The Commissioner’s cross-motion (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED;
2
4. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and
3
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 6, 2024
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?