(HC) Fiorito v. Fikes et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge William B. Shubb on 6/3/2024 ADOPTING 23 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). CASE CLOSED. (Clemente Licea, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL FIORITO , 12 13 14 No. 2:22-cv-2269 WBS AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER FIKES, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On April 16, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 23) are adopted in full; 28 2. This action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 1 1 2 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Dated: June 3, 2024 3 4 5 6 Fior2269.800.hc 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?