Ochoa v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/06/24 EXTENDING Fact Discovery due date to 05/31/24. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MAYALL HURLEY, PC Nicholas John Scardigli (SBN 249947) 2453 Grand Canal Blvd. Stockton, CA 95207 Tele.: 209-477-3833 Fax: 209-473-4818 Email: nscardigli@mayallaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff JUAN OCHOA JR. SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Lindsay S. Fitch (SBN 238227) lfitch@seyfarth.com Bradley D. Doucette (SBN 322611) bdoucette@seyfarth.com 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2300 Sacramento, California 95814-4428 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 Attorneys for Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 16 17 18 JUAN OCHOA JR., Plaintiff, 19 20 21 v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 22 Case No. 2:22-cv-02287-KJM-AC STIPULATION To Continue The Fact Discovery Cutoff To Coincide With The Expert Discovery Cutoff; [PROPOSED] ORDER Complaint Filed: November 18, 2022 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER 308075359v.1 1 Plaintiff JUAN OCHOA, JR. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE 2 CORPORATION (“Defendant”) (collectively with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their 3 respective attorneys of record herein, hereby stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, on June 30, 2023 this Court set a pre-trial case schedule which ordered, in part, 5 that all fact discovery be completed by March 15, 2024 and all expert discovery be completed by May 6 31, 2024. (Dkt. No. 16); 7 WHEREAS, the Parties have engaged in extensive discovery throughout this litigation and will 8 soon commence depositions, but require additional time to complete discovery and depositions before 9 the present fact discovery cutoff. In particular, Defense counsel is presently engaged in trials through 10 the majority of February and March. As such, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed to stipulate 11 to extend the fact discovery cutoff to coincide with the expert discovery cutoff of May 31, 2024 in 12 order to give the Parties more time to conduct the necessary discovery. 13 WHEREAS, this Court’s Standing Scheduling Order provides that “ . . . the Magistrate Judge 14 may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such modification does not have the effect of requiring a 15 change to the balance of the schedule.” (Dkt. No. 17); 16 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a brief modification of the schedule to make the fact 17 discovery cutoff and expert discovery cutoff coincide should not require a change to the balance of the 18 schedule. 19 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 20 21 DATED: February 5, 2024 MAYALL HURLEY P.C. 22 23 By: NICHOLAS F. SCARDIGLI Attorneys for Plaintiff JUAN OCHOA 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER 308075359v.1 1 2 DATED: February 5, 2024 Respectfully submitted, SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 3 4 5 By: Lindsay S. Fitch Bradley D. Doucette 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER 308075359v.1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 The Court, having reviewed the Parties’ Joint Stipulation To Continue The Fact Discovery 3 Cutoff to Coincide With The Expert Discovery Cutoff, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY 4 ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 5 6 7 1. The present Fact Discovery Cutoff is continued to May 31, 2024. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 6, 2024 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER 308075359v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?