Ochoa v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/06/24 EXTENDING Fact Discovery due date to 05/31/24. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MAYALL HURLEY, PC
Nicholas John Scardigli (SBN 249947)
2453 Grand Canal Blvd.
Stockton, CA 95207
Tele.: 209-477-3833
Fax: 209-473-4818
Email: nscardigli@mayallaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JUAN OCHOA JR.
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Lindsay S. Fitch (SBN 238227)
lfitch@seyfarth.com
Bradley D. Doucette (SBN 322611)
bdoucette@seyfarth.com
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2300
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone: (916) 448-0159
Facsimile:
(916) 558-4839
Attorneys for Defendant
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
16
17
18
JUAN OCHOA JR.,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
v.
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION and
DOES 1-10, inclusive,
22
Case No. 2:22-cv-02287-KJM-AC
STIPULATION To Continue The Fact
Discovery Cutoff To Coincide With The
Expert Discovery Cutoff; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Complaint Filed:
November 18, 2022
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT
DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER
308075359v.1
1
Plaintiff JUAN OCHOA, JR. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE
2
CORPORATION (“Defendant”) (collectively with Plaintiff, “the Parties”), by and through their
3
respective attorneys of record herein, hereby stipulate as follows:
4
WHEREAS, on June 30, 2023 this Court set a pre-trial case schedule which ordered, in part,
5
that all fact discovery be completed by March 15, 2024 and all expert discovery be completed by May
6
31, 2024. (Dkt. No. 16);
7
WHEREAS, the Parties have engaged in extensive discovery throughout this litigation and will
8
soon commence depositions, but require additional time to complete discovery and depositions before
9
the present fact discovery cutoff. In particular, Defense counsel is presently engaged in trials through
10
the majority of February and March. As such, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed to stipulate
11
to extend the fact discovery cutoff to coincide with the expert discovery cutoff of May 31, 2024 in
12
order to give the Parties more time to conduct the necessary discovery.
13
WHEREAS, this Court’s Standing Scheduling Order provides that “ . . . the Magistrate Judge
14
may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such modification does not have the effect of requiring a
15
change to the balance of the schedule.” (Dkt. No. 17);
16
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a brief modification of the schedule to make the fact
17
discovery cutoff and expert discovery cutoff coincide should not require a change to the balance of the
18
schedule.
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
20
21
DATED: February 5, 2024
MAYALL HURLEY P.C.
22
23
By:
NICHOLAS F. SCARDIGLI
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JUAN OCHOA
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT
DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER
308075359v.1
1
2
DATED: February 5, 2024
Respectfully submitted,
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
3
4
5
By:
Lindsay S. Fitch
Bradley D. Doucette
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT
DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER
308075359v.1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The Court, having reviewed the Parties’ Joint Stipulation To Continue The Fact Discovery
3
Cutoff to Coincide With The Expert Discovery Cutoff, and good cause appearing therefor, HEREBY
4
ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
5
6
7
1.
The present Fact Discovery Cutoff is continued to May 31, 2024.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 6, 2024
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE THE FACT DISCOVERY CUTOFF TO COINCIDE WITH THE EXPERT
DISCOVERY CUTOFF; [PROPOSED] ORDER
308075359v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?