(PC) Thorn v. Sac Jail

Filing 6

ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/17/2023 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING this action without prejudice, due to plaintiff's failure to obey a court order. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JAYSON THORN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:23-cv-00069-DAD-CKD (PC)

v.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
TO OBEY A COURT ORDER

SAC JAIL,

15

Defendant.
(Doc. No. 5)

16
17

Plaintiff Jayson Thorn is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action

18
19

brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

20

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 8, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations

21
22

recommending this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to obey a

23

court order. (Doc. No. 5.) Specifically, plaintiff on January 18, 2023 was ordered to file a

24

completed in forma pauperis application with the court and failed to do so. (Id.) The pending

25

findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections

26

thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 1.) To date, no objections

27

to the findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now

28

passed.
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

2

de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the

3

findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

4

Accordingly:

5

1.

6

adopted in full;

7

2.

8

This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to obey a
court order; and

9

3.

10
11

The findings and recommendations issued on March 8, 2023 (Doc. No. 5) are

The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

May 17, 2023
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2