(PC) Thorn v. Sac Jail

Filing 6

ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/17/2023 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING this action without prejudice, due to plaintiff's failure to obey a court order. CASE CLOSED. (Rodriguez, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAYSON THORN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:23-cv-00069-DAD-CKD (PC) v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION DUE TO PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER SAC JAIL, 15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 5) 16 17 Plaintiff Jayson Thorn is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 18 19 brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 20 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 8, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 21 22 recommending this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to obey a 23 court order. (Doc. No. 5.) Specifically, plaintiff on January 18, 2023 was ordered to file a 24 completed in forma pauperis application with the court and failed to do so. (Id.) The pending 25 findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections 26 thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 1.) To date, no objections 27 to the findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so has now 28 passed. 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a 2 de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court concludes that the 3 findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 4 Accordingly: 5 1. 6 adopted in full; 7 2. 8 This action is dismissed, without prejudice, due to plaintiff’s failure to obey a court order; and 9 3. 10 11 The findings and recommendations issued on March 8, 2023 (Doc. No. 5) are The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 17, 2023 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?