Bethea v. Infinity Energy Inc. et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 05/09/2024 DENYING 20 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney without prejudice to renewal after substitute counsel appears for Defendant Infinity Energy, Inc. The hearing on the Motion, set for 6/6/2024, is VACATED. (Nair, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 LINDSEY BETHEA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 14 15 v. Plaintiff, No. 2:23-CV-00118-DJC-KJN ORDER INFINITY ENERGY, INC., a California corporation, and SOLAR QUOTE INC., a Delaware registered corporation, 16 Defendants. 17 On April 22, 2024, counsel for Defendant Infinity Energy, Inc., Benjamin Koegel 18 19 of ElGuindy, Meyer & Koegel, APC (“Counsel”), filed a Motion to be Relieved as 20 Counsel. (ECF No. 20.) Fourteen days have passed, and no party has filed an 21 opposition or statement of non-opposition to the Motion. See L.R. 230(c) (opposition 22 to any motion shall be filed within fourteen days). In the Motion, Counsel states that he “is not aware of the name or identity of any 23 24 new counsel that may be retained to defend Infinity Energy, Inc. in this case.” (Mot. 25 (ECF No. 20) at 3.) Additionally, to date, Defendant Infinity Energy, Inc. has not 26 indicated to the Court it has retained new counsel. However, Local Rule 183(a) 27 requires that a “corporation or other entity may appear only by an attorney.” 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 183(a), the Court hereby DENIES the 2 Motion (ECF No. 20) without prejudice to renewal after substitute counsel appears for 3 Defendant Infinity Energy, Inc. 4 The hearing on the Motion, set for 6/6/2024, is VACATED. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2024 Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DJC4 – Bethea23cv00118.MotWithdrawAtty 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?