(HC) Weisner v. Allison

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 09/24/24 ADOPTING 42 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The Court DECLINES to issue COA. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANKIE WEISNER, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:23-cv-0216-TLN-CKD Petitioner, v. ORDER KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Frankie Weisner (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an 18 application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to 19 a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 19, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 42.) 23 Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 43.) 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 28 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case; and 4 3. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 5 6 7 2253. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: September 24, 2024 8 9 10 11 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?