(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/25/2024 ADOPTING 20 Findings and Recommendations in Full, GRANTING 12 Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDING this matter for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Order. CASE CLOSED. (Woodson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WHITNEY A. JONES, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:23-cv-00339-TLN-EFB v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 18 19 denying an application for Disability Income Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social 20 Security Act. On March 13, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within seven days. (ECF No. 20.) Defendant has filed 23 objections. (ECF No. 21.) The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and 24 recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 3 For the reasons stated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on March 13, 2024, are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED; 5 3. The Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 18) is 6 DENIED; 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgement in Plaintiffs’ favor; and 8 5. This matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with 9 10 this Order. Date: March 25, 2024 11 12 13 14 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?