(SS) Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/25/2024 ADOPTING 20 Findings and Recommendations in Full, GRANTING 12 Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING 18 Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDING this matter for further administrative proceedings consistent with this Order. CASE CLOSED. (Woodson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WHITNEY A. JONES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:23-cv-00339-TLN-EFB
v.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security
18
19
denying an application for Disability Income Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social
20
Security Act. On March 13, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
21
herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and
22
recommendations were to be filed within seven days. (ECF No. 20.) Defendant has filed
23
objections. (ECF No. 21.) The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and
24
recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
For the reasons stated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations, filed on March 13, 2024, are ADOPTED IN
FULL;
4
2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED;
5
3. The Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 18) is
6
DENIED;
7
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgement in Plaintiffs’ favor; and
8
5. This matter is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with
9
10
this Order.
Date: March 25, 2024
11
12
13
14
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?