LaComba et al v Eagle Home Loans and Investment LLC, et al

Filing 56

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/27/2024 EXTENDING the deadline for Defendant Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint to 20 days after written notice is provided by Plaintiffs to DTLS' counsel. (Clemente Licea, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation JOHN L. HOSACK, ESQ. (SBN: 42876) JASON L. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ. (SBN: 207481) 1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500 Los Angeles, CA 90017-1730 Telephone: 213.891.0700 Fax: 213.896.0400 Email: jhosack@buchalter.com Attorneys for Defendant Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LARRY LEE LACOMBA, SR., AND ROCHELLE LOUISE LACOMBA, HUSBAND AND WIFE, Plaintiffs, vs. EAGLE HOME LOANS AND INVESTMENT, LLC, a California limited liability company; DEL TORO LOAN SERVICING, INC., a California corporation, qualified to do business in California; and DOES 1 through 20, CASE NO.: 2:23-CV-00370-KJM-DB STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO DEFENDANT DEL TORO LOAN SERVICING, INC. TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BUCHALTER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BN 81539564v1 1 Defendant Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc., (“DTLS”), and Plaintiffs Larry Lee Lacomba, Sr. 2 and Rochelle Louise Lacomba, Husband and Wife, (“Plaintiffs”), (collectively the, “Stipulating 3 Parties”), hereby stipulate as follows: 4 1. WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) has been served on 5 DTLS and DLTS’ response to Plaintiffs’ SAC must be filed by Thursday, March 21, 6 2024; 7 2. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ have granted DLTS an “open” extension of time to respond to 8 the SAC, subject to twenty (20) days written notice from Plaintiffs to DLTS’ counsel to 9 respond to the SAC; 10 3. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are currently responding to a Motion to Dismiss filed by 11 Defendant Eagle Home Loans and Investment, LLC (“Eagle”); 12 4. WHEREAS, after Plaintiffs have responded to Eagle’s Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs 13 want to obtain the production of documents and take the deposition of DLTS; and, 14 5. WHEREAS, depending on what the Plaintiffs discover from the production of 15 documents and deposition of DLTS, the Plaintiffs’ may dismiss their SAC against 16 DTLS. 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Stipulating Parties that DLTS’ s time 18 to file a response to the Plaintiffs’ SAC shall be extended to a date after twenty (20) days written 19 notice is given to DLTS’ counsel. 20 21 SO STIPULATED. DATED: March 27, 2024 22 BUCHALTER A Professional Corporation 23 By: /s/ Jason E. Goldstein JOHN L. HOSACK, ESQ. JASON E. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendant, DEL TORO LOAN SERVICING, INC. 24 25 26 27 28 BUCHALTER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BN 81539564v1 1 DATED: March 27, 2024 LAW OFFICE OF JOHN KEVIN CROWLEY 2 3 By: /s/ John Kevin Crowley JOHN KEVIN CROWLEY, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiffs, LARRY LEE LACOMBA, SR. and ROCHELLE LOUISE LACOMBA 4 5 6 ORDER 7 8 9 The Court, having considered the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and finding good cause existing, approves the stipulation and hereby Orders as follows: 10 Defendant Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc.’s response to the Plaintiffs’ Second Amended 11 Complaint shall be due at a period after twenty (20) days written notice is provided by Plaintiffs to 12 DTLS’ counsel. 13 14 SO ORDERED. DATED: March 27, 2024. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BUCHALTER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION LOS ANGELES 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT BN 81539564v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?