LaComba et al v Eagle Home Loans and Investment LLC, et al
Filing
56
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/27/2024 EXTENDING the deadline for Defendant Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc. to Respond to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint to 20 days after written notice is provided by Plaintiffs to DTLS' counsel. (Clemente Licea, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BUCHALTER
A Professional Corporation
JOHN L. HOSACK, ESQ. (SBN: 42876)
JASON L. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ. (SBN: 207481)
1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1500
Los Angeles, CA 90017-1730
Telephone: 213.891.0700
Fax: 213.896.0400
Email: jhosack@buchalter.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LARRY LEE LACOMBA, SR., AND
ROCHELLE LOUISE LACOMBA, HUSBAND
AND WIFE,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
EAGLE HOME LOANS AND INVESTMENT,
LLC, a California limited liability company;
DEL TORO LOAN SERVICING, INC., a
California corporation, qualified to do business
in California; and DOES 1 through 20,
CASE NO.: 2:23-CV-00370-KJM-DB
STIPULATION AND ORDER
GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
TO DEFENDANT DEL TORO LOAN
SERVICING, INC. TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BUCHALTER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LOS ANGELES
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
BN 81539564v1
1
Defendant Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc., (“DTLS”), and Plaintiffs Larry Lee Lacomba, Sr.
2
and Rochelle Louise Lacomba, Husband and Wife, (“Plaintiffs”), (collectively the, “Stipulating
3
Parties”), hereby stipulate as follows:
4
1. WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) has been served on
5
DTLS and DLTS’ response to Plaintiffs’ SAC must be filed by Thursday, March 21,
6
2024;
7
2. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ have granted DLTS an “open” extension of time to respond to
8
the SAC, subject to twenty (20) days written notice from Plaintiffs to DLTS’ counsel to
9
respond to the SAC;
10
3. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are currently responding to a Motion to Dismiss filed by
11
Defendant Eagle Home Loans and Investment, LLC (“Eagle”);
12
4. WHEREAS, after Plaintiffs have responded to Eagle’s Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs
13
want to obtain the production of documents and take the deposition of DLTS; and,
14
5. WHEREAS, depending on what the Plaintiffs discover from the production of
15
documents and deposition of DLTS, the Plaintiffs’ may dismiss their SAC against
16
DTLS.
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Stipulating Parties that DLTS’ s time
18
to file a response to the Plaintiffs’ SAC shall be extended to a date after twenty (20) days written
19
notice is given to DLTS’ counsel.
20
21
SO STIPULATED.
DATED: March 27, 2024
22
BUCHALTER
A Professional Corporation
23
By: /s/ Jason E. Goldstein
JOHN L. HOSACK, ESQ.
JASON E. GOLDSTEIN, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant,
DEL TORO LOAN SERVICING, INC.
24
25
26
27
28
BUCHALTER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LOS ANGELES
2
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
BN 81539564v1
1
DATED: March 27, 2024
LAW OFFICE OF JOHN KEVIN CROWLEY
2
3
By: /s/ John Kevin Crowley
JOHN KEVIN CROWLEY, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
LARRY LEE LACOMBA, SR. and
ROCHELLE LOUISE LACOMBA
4
5
6
ORDER
7
8
9
The Court, having considered the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and finding good
cause existing, approves the stipulation and hereby Orders as follows:
10
Defendant Del Toro Loan Servicing, Inc.’s response to the Plaintiffs’ Second Amended
11
Complaint shall be due at a period after twenty (20) days written notice is provided by Plaintiffs to
12
DTLS’ counsel.
13
14
SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 27, 2024.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BUCHALTER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
LOS ANGELES
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
BN 81539564v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?