(HC) Anderson v. State of California

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/22/2023 DENYING 8 Motion to Amend the Complaint. No orders will issue in response to future filings. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DION ANDERSON,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:23-cv-0522 KJN P

v.

ORDER

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15

Respondents.

16
On May 15, 2023, the district court remanded this action to the Sacramento County

17
18

Superior Court. On that same day, plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a document

19

styled “Motion for an Expedited Hearing/Judgment and/or Request to File an Amended

20

Complaint.” (ECF No. 8.) (ECF No. 8.) However, this action is closed. If petitioner wishes to

21

amend his underlying pleading, he must file the motion in the Sacramento County Superior Court

22

action. The district court promptly remanded the action to the state court and all of petitioner’s

23

subsequent filings must be directed to the state court.
This action was closed on May 15, 2023. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by

24
25

plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future

26

filings.

27

////

28

////
1

1

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to

2

amend (ECF No. 8) is denied, and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

3

Dated: May 22, 2023

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2