(PC) Springfield v. CDCR et al
Filing
9
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 2/7/2024 REASSIGNING this CASE to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson for all further proceedings. The New Case Number is: 2:23-c v-00594-DAD JDP and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders, for the reasons set forth in the 11/17/2023 order. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. These Finding and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to these F&Rs due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
Case No. 2:23-cv-00594-JDP (PC)
ORDER
DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO
ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS
MATTER
CDCR, et al.¸
Defendants.
16
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND COMPLY
WITH COURT ORDERS
17
18
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
19
20
On September 20, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that only some
21
his claims were cognizable. ECF No. 7. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint
22
or an advisement indicating his intent to proceed only with the identified cognizable claims.
23
Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint.
24
Accordingly, on November 17, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days
25
why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 8. I notified him that if he wished to continue
26
with this action he must file, within twenty-one days, an amended complaint or advisement of his
27
intent to proceed with the cognizable claims. I also warned him that failure to comply with the
28
order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id.
1
1
2
The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise
responded to the November 17, 2023 order.
3
4
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a
United States District Judge to this case.
5
Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that:
6
1. This action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to
7
comply with court orders, for the reasons set forth in the November 17, 2023 order.
8
2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close the case.
9
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
10
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
11
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
12
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
13
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
14
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
15
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
16
appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez
17
v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated:
February 7, 2024
22
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?