Blankership v. City of Sacramento

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/5/24 CONTINUING the initial expert disclosure deadline to 11/18/24, the rebuttal expert disclosure deadline to 12/16/24, the expert discovery deadline to 2/7/25 and the dispositive motion deadline to 3/10/25. All other discovery deadlines and motion deadlines shall remain unchanged. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney (SBN 156366) DAVID J. GIBSON, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 272516) dgibson@cityofsacramento.org CITY OF SACRAMENTO 915 I Street, Room 4010 Sacramento, CA 95814-2608 Telephone: (916) 808-5346 Facsimile: (916) 808-7455 Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO MARK P. VELEZ, ESQ. (SBN 163484) NATALYA V. GRUNWALD, ESQ. (SBN 265084) THE VELEZ LAW FIRM, PC 3010 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 120 Roseville, California 95661 Telephone: (916) 774 – 2720 Facsimile: (916) 774 – 2730 Attorneys for Plaintiff ADAM BLANKENSHIP 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 Case No.: 2:23-cv-00610-KJM-CKD ADAM BLANKENSHIP, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND EXPERT DISCOVERY AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, Defendant. 21 22 23 The Parties, Plaintiff Adam Blankenship and Defendant City of Sacramento hereby 24 stipulate, through their respective counsel of record, to the below based upon the following 25 good cause: 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1397782)}» STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 2 1. Existing Due Date and Deadlines and Proposed New Deadlines (per Document 4-1 (“Standing Order”), No. 8 (A)). 3 4 Current Deadline Proposed New Deadline 5 Initial Expert Disclosure June 24, 2024 November 18, 2024 6 Rebuttal Witness Disclosure July 15, 2024 December 16, 2024 7 Expert Discovery Close October 21, 2024 February 7, 2025 8 Dispositive Motion Deadline November 20, 2024 March 10, 2025 9 Trail Date Not Set Not Set 10 11 2. Good Cause for Granting the Extension (per Standing Order No. 8 (B): 12 The Parties have diligently pursued discovery. Each party has conducted written 13 discovery, including interrogatories and requests for production of documents, and the parties 14 are in the process of conducting fact depositions, including depositions of Plaintiff’s medical 15 treaters, which are not yet completed. Those treaters were not discovered until Plaintiff’s 16 deposition which took place on May 10 and May 14, 2024. The parties are also in process of 17 reviewing other witness deposition transcripts, some of which are not yet available. The parties 18 each need to complete fact discovery and have the transcripts in order to interview, select, and 19 prepare expert witnesses. 20 Additionally, the parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions and preparing for 21 an ADR session through the court-sponsored VDRP. The parties are working with neutral 22 Terry Wills. The selected mediation date is September 12, 2024. This was the first mutually 23 available date for counsel, clients, and Ms. Wills. Moving the expert witness discovery 24 deadlines until after mediation will facilitate settlement by eliminating potential significant 25 expert witness costs for each party. 26 The Parties have agreed to the modification of the discovery schedule in section 1 above. 27 3. Prior Requests for Extensions (per Standing Order No. 8 (C): The parties jointly 28 made one (1) request for a discovery extension in this matter, on April 18, 2024. (See 2 1397782)}» STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 Document 17, “Stipulation and Proposed Order to Extend Discovery Deadline”). In the prior 2 request, the Court granted the request to extend the fact discovery deadline from May 10, 2024 3 to June 10, 2024, and to extend the initial expert disclosure deadline from June 17, 2024 to 4 June 24, 2024. The extension was granted. 5 6 DATED: May 30, 2024 THE VELEZ LAW FIRM, PC 7 By: 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff ADAM BLANKENSHIP 10 11 /s/Natalya V. Grunwald NATALYA V. GRUNWALD DATED: May 30, 2024 SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney 12 13 By: 14 15 /s/ DAVID J. GIBSON DAVID J. GIBSON Senior Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of the parties, finds good cause to order as follows: 1. The initial expert disclosure deadline shall be continued from June 24, 2024 to November 18, 2024. 22 23 2. The rebuttal expert disclosure shall be continued from July 15, 2024 to December 16, 2024. 24 25 3. The expert discovery deadline shall be continued from October 21, 2024 to February 7, 2025. 26 27 4. The dispositive motion deadline shall be continued from November 20, 2024 to March 10, 2025. 28 3 1397782)}» STIPULATION AND ORDER 1 5. All other discovery deadlines and motion deadlines shall remain unchanged. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: June 5, 2024. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1397782)}» STIPULATION AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?