(PS) Larson v. Commonspirit Health

Filing 6

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/2024 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Clemente Licea, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NANCEE LARSON, 12 13 Case No. 2:23-cv-00747-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER 14 COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against Defendants. This matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 19 302. On February 23, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 21 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 5.) The time to file objections 22 has passed, and no objections were filed. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ….”). 27 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 28 the record and by the proper analysis. 1 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The proposed findings and recommendations filed on, February 23, 2024, (ECF No. 5) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 6 Date: March 27, 2024 7 8 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?