(PS) Larson v. Commonspirit Health
Filing
6
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/27/2024 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Clemente Licea, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NANCEE LARSON,
12
13
Case No. 2:23-cv-00747-TLN-JDP
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action against Defendants. This matter was
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule
19
302. On February 23, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
21
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 5.) The time to file objections
22
has passed, and no objections were filed.
23
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
24
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
25
See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the
26
magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court ….”).
27
Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by
28
the record and by the proper analysis.
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The proposed findings and recommendations filed on, February 23, 2024, (ECF
No. 5) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
4
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and
5
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
6
Date: March 27, 2024
7
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?