(PC) Ricalls v. Andrew
Filing
10
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/2/24 ADOPTING in full 9 Findings and Recommendations and 1 plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES LEONARD RICALLS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:23-cv-00771-TLN-EFB
v.
ORDER
P. ANDREW,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 29, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file
23
objections has passed, and neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported
24
25
by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed on November 29, 2023 (ECF No. 9) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
4
2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice;
5
3. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability; and
6
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
7
Date: February 2, 2024
8
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?