(PC) Dailey v. Solano County Sheriff et al
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 03/27/24 DIRECTING Plaintiff to file the first Amended Complaint within 30 days. (Licea Chavez, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHARON N. DAILEY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:23-cv-0787 DAD DB P
v.
ORDER
SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a former county inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42
17
18
U.S.C. §1983. In July 2023, this court granted plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis
19
and, upon screening, found plaintiff alleged no claims for relief cognizable under section 1983.
20
(ECF No. 5.) The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend.
The court’s order was returned by the Postal Service because plaintiff was no longer in
21
22
custody and plaintiff had not provided the court with a new address. In December 2023, the court
23
dismissed this action without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute it. (ECF No. 9.)
24
Shortly thereafter, plaintiff filed a change of address and asked that the case be reopened. That
25
request was granted. (ECF No. 14.)
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days plaintiff shall file a first
2
amended complaint as set out in the court’s July 25, 2023 order.
3
Dated: March 27, 2024
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:9
DB Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/dail0787.reopen LTA
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?