(PS) Halousek v. CA Public Employees' Retirement System et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/17/2023 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and ORDERING that service is appropriate for California Public Employees' Retirement System; Clerk to issue process and send plaintiff 1 USM-285 form for each defendant, 1 summons, copy of complaint and a consent form. Plaintiff shall complete and submit service documents to the USM within 10 days and file a statement with the court regarding the submission of documents. USM is directed to serve process as directed. (Rodriguez, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHEILA HALOUSEK,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’
RETIREMENT SYSTEM, et al.,

No. 2:23–cv–839–KJM–KJN PS
ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST;
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE (AND
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE) BY
THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL
(ECF No. 2)

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel in this action, requests leave to proceed in forma

18

pauperis (“IFP”). 1 (ECF No. 2.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (authorizing the commencement of an

19

action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees).

20

Plaintiff’s affidavit makes the required financial showing, and so plaintiff’s request is granted.

21

However, the determination that a plaintiff may proceed without payment of fees does not

22

complete the inquiry. Under the IFP statute, the court must screen the complaint and dismiss any

23

claims that are “frivolous or malicious,” fail to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or

24

seek monetary relief against an immune defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Further, the federal

25

court has an independent duty to ensure it has subject matter jurisdiction over the case. See

26

United Investors Life Ins. Co. v. Waddell & Reed Inc., 360 F.3d 960, 967 (9th Cir. 2004).

27
28

1

Actions where a party proceeds without counsel are referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to
E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72.
1

1

The court finds that plaintiff’s complaint states a claim that is sufficiently cognizable to

2

survive this initial screening inquiry as against defendant CalPERS. 2 Accordingly, the court

3

orders service of process on CalPERS by the U.S. Marshal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). However,

4

plaintiff must assist in providing the necessary information and materials for the Marshal to effect

5

service (see paragraphs 5 and 6 below for plaintiff’s required next steps).

6

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7

1.

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED;

8

2.

Service of the complaint is appropriate for the following named defendants:

9

(i)

10

3.

California Public Employees’ Retirement System;

The Clerk of Court shall issue forthwith all process pursuant to Federal Rule of

11

Civil Procedure 4 without prepayment of costs. The Clerk shall send to plaintiff:

12

(i)

one copy of this order;

13

(ii)

one copy of the court’s forthcoming order setting status conference;

14

(iii)

a copy of the Magistrate Judge Consent/Decline form for each named

15

defendant; and

16

(iv)

17

defendant;

18

4.

19

///

20

///

21

2

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

a summons and a USM-285 form (with related documents) for each named

The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal;

Service will not be ordered on defendant “State of California Department of Justice Office of
the Attorney General,” as the complaint states no facts indicating a claim exists against this entity.
The facts in the complaint focus on irregularities in the distribution of plaintiff’s pension by
CalPERS. While there may still exist legal issues to resolve against this entity, no facts are stated
concerning Cal. DOJ’s participation in the alleged acts. As to CalPERS, the court reserves
decision on the merits of plaintiff’s claims until the record is sufficiently developed. This order
does not preclude CalPERS from challenging plaintiff’s complaint through a timely motion under
Rule 12 or other appropriate method.
Further, plaintiff appends a copy of a motion for cert filed with the U.S. Supreme Court in
2018 after her case was dismissed by the Cal. Court of Appeal 3d Dist. See 2018 WL 2075998
(Cal. App. 3d 2018); cert. denied, Apr 15, 2019, 139 S. Ct. 1558. However, this brief appears
only to provide background to plaintiff’s allegations, and does not provide further support for
service on Cal. DOJ.
2

1
2

Plaintiff’s Required Submission of Documents to U.S. Marshal
5.

Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the U.S.

3

Marshal (501 I Street, 5th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814) the following:

4

(i)

1 copy of this order;

5

(ii)

1 copy copies of the court’s order setting status conference;

6

(iii)

1 copy copies of the Magistrate Judge Consent/Decline form;

7

(iv)

A completed summons and completed USM-285 form for each defendant;

8

and

9
10

(v)
6.

11
12
13

2 copies of the complaint;

Within 10 days of submitting these documents to the U.S. Marshal, plaintiff shall
file with the court a statement indicating that the documents have been submitted;

Marshal’s Request for Waiver of Service
7.

Within 14 days of receipt of plaintiff’s submitted documents, the U.S. Marshal

14

shall notify each defendant of the commencement of this action and request a

15

waiver of service of summons in accordance with the provisions of Federal Rule of

16

Civil Procedure 4(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c);

17

8.

If a defendant waives service, the defendant is required to return the signed waiver
to the U.S. Marshal within 30 days from the date the request was sent;

18
19

a. Failure to return the signed waiver may subject a defendant to an order to

20

pay service costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2); and
b. The filing of an answer or a responsive motion does not relieve a defendant

21

of this requirement;

22
23

9.

requests for waivers that are returned as undelivered, as soon as they are received;

24
25
26
27
28

The U.S. Marshal shall file returned waivers of service of summons, as well as any

Marshal’s Service of Process
10.

If a defendant does not return a signed waiver of service of summons within 30
days from the date the waiver request was sent, the U.S. Marshal shall:
a. Within 60 days of the expiration of the waiver deadline, personally serve
3

1

process––along with a copy of this court’s order setting status conference,

2

a Magistrate Judge Consent/Decline form, and a copy of this order––on

3

each of the named defendants in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil

4

Procedure 4 and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), and shall command all necessary

5

assistance from any last known employer of a defendant to execute this

6

order. The U.S. Marshal shall maintain the confidentiality of all

7

information so provided pursuant to this order; and

8

b. Within 14 days after personal service is effected, file the return of service,

9

along with evidence of any attempts to secure a waiver of service of

10

summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the

11

defendant. Such costs shall be enumerated on the USM-285 form and shall

12

include the costs incurred by the U.S. Marshal’s office for photocopying

13

additional copies of the summons and complaint and for preparing new

14

USM-285 forms, if required. Costs of service will be taxed against the

15

personally served defendant in accordance with the provisions of Federal

16

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d)(2).

17

11.

In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason, to effect service on any

18

defendant within this time frame, the Marshal shall report that fact, and the reasons

19

for it, to the undersigned;

20

Miscellaneous Orders

21

12.

22

Following service, or waiver of service, defendants shall reply to the complaint
within the time provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a); and

23

13.

Failure to comply with this order may result in any appropriate sanctions,

24

including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of the action pursuant to Federal

25

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

26
27
28

Dated: May 17, 2023
halo.839

4