Cook v. Board of Trustees of CSU, et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 6/5/2024 EXTENDING the deadline for Non-Expert Discovery to 8/14/2024. (Clemente Licea, O)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494
David R. Norton, SBN 291448
Larissa C. Celaya, SBN 332882
2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500
Sacramento, CA 95815
TEL: 916.929.1481
FAX: 916.927.3706
EMAIL: cfessenden@porterscott.com
dnorton@porterscott.com
lcelaya@porterscott.com
Attorneys for Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, (also erroneously sued
as CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO; and STATE OF CALIFORNIA) and ELVIA RAMIREZ
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
BOOKER COOK, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA
STATE
UNIVERSITY;
CALIFORNIA
STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO;
STATE
OF
CALIFORNIA;
ELVIA
RAMIREZ, an individual; and DOES 1 through
50, inclusive,
Defendants.
______________________________________/
CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-00843-DJC-CKD
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
Complaint Filed: 10/14/2022
First Amended Complaint Filed: 12/16/2022
Removed: 5/5/2023
Second Amended Complaint Filed: 6/16/2023
21
22
This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff BOOKER COOK (“Plaintiff”) and
23
Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, (also erroneously sued as
24
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO; and STATE OF CALIFORNIA) and ELVIA
25
RAMIREZ (“Defendants”) through their respective counsel of record. The Parties enter into this stipulation
26
and proposed order in compliance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and the requirements of
27
the scheduling order. The parties request to briefly continue the non-expert discovery deadline for 60 days
28
solely as it pertains to the deposition of one third-party witness.
{4886-1952-8388}
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
1
WHEREAS, trial is currently set for June 16, 2025;
2
WHEREAS, on July 6, 2023, the Court issued a Scheduling Order setting the non-expert discovery
3
4
5
cut-off date as June 14, 2024;
WHEREAS, the parties have diligently been participating in non-expert discovery, including the
exchange of several sets of written discovery and conducting depositions;
6
WHEREAS, the parties intend to complete one additional deposition of third-party witness Dr.
7
Boatamo Mosupyoe. However, due to scheduling conflicts between counsel and the witness, the parties are
8
unable to complete the deposition prior to the close of discovery;
9
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and propose that the non-expert discovery deadline be
10
continued to August 14, 2024 solely as it pertains to the completion of the deposition of Dr. Mosupyoe and
11
any related motions arising out of such deposition.
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
13
14
Dated: June 5, 2024
15
16
PORTER SCOTT
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
By
17
18
19
20
/s/ David R. Norton
Carl L. Fessenden
David R. Norton
Larissa C. Celaya
Attorneys for Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and
ELVIA RAMIREZ
21
22
Dated: June 4, 2024
Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin, III
23
By
24
Johnny L. Griffin, III
Manolo Olaso
Attorneys for Plaintiff BOOKER COOK
25
26
27
28
{4886-1952-8388}
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the deadline
3
for Non-Expert Discovery is extended to August 14, 2024 solely as it pertains to the completion of the
4
deposition of Dr. Boatamo Mosupyoe and any related motions arising out of such deposition.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: June 5, 2024
9
/s/ Daniel J. Calabretta
THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{4886-1952-8388}
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?