Cook v. Board of Trustees of CSU, et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 6/5/2024 EXTENDING the deadline for Non-Expert Discovery to 8/14/2024. (Clemente Licea, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 David R. Norton, SBN 291448 Larissa C. Celaya, SBN 332882 2180 Harvard Street, Suite 500 Sacramento, CA 95815 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 EMAIL: cfessenden@porterscott.com dnorton@porterscott.com lcelaya@porterscott.com Attorneys for Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, (also erroneously sued as CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO; and STATE OF CALIFORNIA) and ELVIA RAMIREZ 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 BOOKER COOK, an individual, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY; CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ELVIA RAMIREZ, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. ______________________________________/ CASE NO.: 2:23-cv-00843-DJC-CKD JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER Complaint Filed: 10/14/2022 First Amended Complaint Filed: 12/16/2022 Removed: 5/5/2023 Second Amended Complaint Filed: 6/16/2023 21 22 This Stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff BOOKER COOK (“Plaintiff”) and 23 Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, (also erroneously sued as 24 CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SACRAMENTO; and STATE OF CALIFORNIA) and ELVIA 25 RAMIREZ (“Defendants”) through their respective counsel of record. The Parties enter into this stipulation 26 and proposed order in compliance with the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) and the requirements of 27 the scheduling order. The parties request to briefly continue the non-expert discovery deadline for 60 days 28 solely as it pertains to the deposition of one third-party witness. {4886-1952-8388} 1 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER 1 WHEREAS, trial is currently set for June 16, 2025; 2 WHEREAS, on July 6, 2023, the Court issued a Scheduling Order setting the non-expert discovery 3 4 5 cut-off date as June 14, 2024; WHEREAS, the parties have diligently been participating in non-expert discovery, including the exchange of several sets of written discovery and conducting depositions; 6 WHEREAS, the parties intend to complete one additional deposition of third-party witness Dr. 7 Boatamo Mosupyoe. However, due to scheduling conflicts between counsel and the witness, the parties are 8 unable to complete the deposition prior to the close of discovery; 9 WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and propose that the non-expert discovery deadline be 10 continued to August 14, 2024 solely as it pertains to the completion of the deposition of Dr. Mosupyoe and 11 any related motions arising out of such deposition. 12 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 13 14 Dated: June 5, 2024 15 16 PORTER SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION By 17 18 19 20 /s/ David R. Norton Carl L. Fessenden David R. Norton Larissa C. Celaya Attorneys for Defendants BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY and ELVIA RAMIREZ 21 22 Dated: June 4, 2024 Law Offices of Johnny L. Griffin, III 23 By 24 Johnny L. Griffin, III Manolo Olaso Attorneys for Plaintiff BOOKER COOK 25 26 27 28 {4886-1952-8388} 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the deadline 3 for Non-Expert Discovery is extended to August 14, 2024 solely as it pertains to the completion of the 4 deposition of Dr. Boatamo Mosupyoe and any related motions arising out of such deposition. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: June 5, 2024 9 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {4886-1952-8388} 3 JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?