(SS) Seibel v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/6/2024 AWARDING the Plaintiff Fees and Expenses in the amount of $4,158.54 and DENYING 22 Motion for Attorney Fees as moot. (Woodson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE, WSBA No. 32245
Associate General Counsel
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
Social Security Administration
MARCELO ILLARMO (MABN 670079)
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, Maryland 21235
Telephone: (510) 970-4822
Email: Marcelo.Illarmo@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
SCOTT C. SEIBEL,
)
)
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
)
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,)
)
)
Defendant
)
)
____________________________________ )
Case No. 2:23-cv-00867-AC
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S
FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT (EAJA)
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel,
subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff shall commissioner
be awarded attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28
23
U.S.C. sec. 2412(d), in the amount of four thousand one hundred fifty-eight dollars and fifty-four
24
cents ($4,158.54) and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all
25
legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in
26
accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). Accordingly, should this Court award fees and
27
expenses under EAJA pursuant to this stipulation, Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (ECF 22)
28
would be moot.
Stip. and Prop. Order for Fees
E.D. Cal. 2:23-cv-00867-AC
1
2
3
4
5
6
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the
matter of any assignment of EAJA fees by Plaintiff to his counsel Jesse Kaplan (Counsel). Pursuant
to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor
the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United
States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the
government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that
7
Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses
8
and costs to be made directly to Counsel pursuant to an assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any
9
payments made shall be delivered to Counsel.
10
11
12
13
14
15
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney
fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or
otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any
and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Counsel, including his firm, may have relating to EAJA attorney
fees in connection with this action.
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney
fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA .
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
18
19
Dated: February 6, 2024
By:
20
21
22
/s/ Jesse Kaplan*
JESSE KAPLAN
*By email authorization on 2/6/24
Attorney for Plaintiff
23
24
Dated: February 6, 2024
25
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
By:
26
27
/s/ Marcelo Illarmo
MARCELO ILLARMO
Special Assistant United States Attorney
28
Stip. and Prop. Order for Fees
E.D. Cal. 2:23-cv-00867-AC
1
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act
2
Fees, Costs, and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $4,158.54 as
3
authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject
4
to the terms of the Stipulation. Furthermore, Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees (ECF 22) is denied
5
as moot.
6
7
DATED: February 6, 2024
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stip. and Prop. Order for Fees
E.D. Cal. 2:23-cv-00867-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?