(HC) Johnson v. Warden
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/23/2024 GRANTING the 41 Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time. The time within which defendants may answer or move under Rule 12 is EXTENDED from 10/4/2024 to within 14 days after the filing of any final order determining whether any additional claims have been stated in the First Amended Complaint. (Spichka, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ANDREW T. CAULFIELD, SBN 238300
JOE LITTLE, SBN 322179
CAULFIELD LAW FIRM
1101 Investment Blvd., Suite 120
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Telephone: (916) 933-3200
Facsimile: (916) 605-4075
andrew@caulfieldlawfirm.com
joe@caulfieldlawfirm.com
Attorneys for Defendants Matthew French,
Sara Reimche, and Alex Luca
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BRANDON R. JOHNSON,
11
Case No. 2:23-cv-00908-KJM-JDP
Plaintiff,
12
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS MATTHEW FRENCH,
SARA REIMCHE, AND ALEX LUCA’S
EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
v.
13
14
WARDEN, MATTHEW FRENCH,
SARA REIMCHE, AND ALEX LUCA,
15
16
[Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson]
Defendants.
______________________________________
17
Having reviewed Defendants Matthew French, Sarah Reimche and Alex Luca’s Ex Parte
18
Application For An Extension of Time to Respond (“Ex Parte”), and finding that good exists
19
therefor, the Court hereby orders as follows:
20
The Ex Parte is granted. The time within which Defendants French, Reimche and Luca may
21
answer or move under Rule 12 is extended from October 4, 2024 to within 14 days after the filing of
22
any final order determining whether any additional claims have been stated in the First Amended
23
Complaint (as required by the Court’s May 23, 2024 Order).
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated:
October 23, 2024
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order Granting Ex Parte Application
Case No. 2:23-cv-00908-KJM-JDP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?