(PS) Mogadem v. State Bar of CA, et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/27/2024 ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). CASE CLOSED. (Clemente Licea, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LALA MOGADEM,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:23-cv-00981-KJM-CKD

v.

ORDER

STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
On February 6, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which

18
19

were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and

20

recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. That period having passed, plaintiff

21

has not objected to the findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,

22
23

602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed

24

de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law

25

by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court

26

. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

27

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are adopted in full;

3

2. The action is dismissed as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and

4

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

5

DATED: March 27, 2024.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2