(HC) Tinsley v. Hill

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/2/24 ADOPTING in full 14 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 1 Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DONALD E. TINSLEY,

12

No. 2:23-cv-01036-TLN-EFB

Petitioner,

13

v.

14

T. HILL,

15

ORDER

Respondent.

16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed an application for a writ of

17
18

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On December 19, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties, and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file

23

objections has passed, and neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported

24
25

by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1
2
3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 19, 2023 (ECF No. 14) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;

4

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED;

5

3. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability; and

6

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

7

Date: February 2, 2024

8
9
10
11

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2