(PC) Hatchett v. Clark et al

Filing 14

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge William B. Shubb on 3/7/2025 ADOPTING 8 Findings and Recommendations in full; DISMISSING the complaint without leave to amend; DENYING as moot 12 Motion for Protective Order. CASE CLOSED. (Deputy Clerk KEZ)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CECIL JEROME HATCHETT,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:23-cv-1215 WBS AC P

v.

ORDER

KEN CLARK, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On July 29, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 11.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

26

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 8) are adopted in full;

3

2. The complaint is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim;

4

3. Plaintiff’s motion for protective order (ECF No. 12) is denied as moot; and

5

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

6

Dated: March 7, 2025

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2