(PC) Akbar v. Lundy et al

Filing 9

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/2023 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller and Magistrate Judge K endall J. Newman for all further proceedings. It is further RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. New Case Number: 2:23-cv-1335 KJM KJN (PC). (Lopez, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

HAMED AKBAR,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:23-cv-1335 KJN P

v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN LUNDY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
By order filed September 29, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days

17
18

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has expired, and plaintiff

19

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff

20
21

was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current

22

address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of

23

the party is fully effective.
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is

24
25

directed to assign a district judge to this case; and
IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule

26
27

110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

28

////
1

1

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

2

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

3

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

4

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

5

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

6

specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

7

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

8

Dated: November 14, 2023

9
10
11

/akba1335.fta.nca

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2