(PC) Harris v. Dube

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge William B. Shubb on 8/29/2024 ADOPTING 30 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 18 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant shall file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint within 30 days of the date of this order. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID D. HARRIS, 12 No. 2:23-CV-1664-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 J. DUBE, 15 ORDER Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 17 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On July 8, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. Following Plaintiff's notice of change of address, the findings 23 and recommendations were re-served on Plaintiff at his new address on July 25, 2024. No 24 objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 26 supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. 3 The findings and recommendations filed July 8, 2024, ECF No. 30, are adopted in full. 4 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 18, is DENIED. 5 3. Defendant shall file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint within 30 days of the 6 date of this order. 7 4. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further 8 proceedings. 9 Dated: August 29, 2024 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?