Beltran et al v. Doctors Medical Center of Modesto et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/13/23 GRANTING #34 Stipulation. Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to the Motion to dismiss shall be STAYED pending a decision on Defendants' anticipated motion for consolidation. (Licea Chavez, V)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
6
7

LORI BELTRAN, BRITTANY MATUS,
PRESTON MEISNER, PAUL
BLUMBERG, and MARK MEHRING on
Behalf of Themselves and All Others
Similarly Situated,

8
9
10
11

Case No.: 2:23-cv-01670-TLN-CKD
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
STAYING DEADLINES PENDING
DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’
ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR
CONSOLIDATION

Plaintiffs,
v.
DOCTORS MEDICAL CENTER OF
MODESTO, TENET HEALTH, and META
PLATFORMS, INC.,

12

Complaint Filing Date: August 10, 2023
Current Motion To Dismiss Response Date:
November 15, 2023
Current Deadline To File Joint Proposed
Case Schedule: November 15, 2023

Defendants.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

On November 8, 2023, Plaintiffs Lori Beltran, Brittany Matus, Preston Meisner, Paul
Blumberg, and Mark Mehring (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Doctors Medical Center of Modesto
and Tenet Healthcare Corporation erroneously sued as Tenet Health (collectively, “Defendants”)
filed their Stipulation Staying Deadlines Pending Decision on Defendants’ Anticipated Motion
for Consolidation (ECF 34).
The Court, having considered the Parties’ stipulation and finding good cause therefor,
hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows:
1. Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to the Motion to dismiss shall be stayed pending a
decision on Defendants’ anticipated motion for consolidation. Should this Court deny
consolidation, and/or a consolidated complaint is not necessitated by the Court’s order, Plaintiffs
shall file their opposition to the pending Motion to Dismiss within 14 days of the Court’s order,
with Defendants’ reply due 14 days thereafter.
2. The Parties’ deadline to file a joint proposed case schedule shall be stayed pending
a decision on Defendants’ anticipated motion for consolidation.

Should this Court deny

consolidation, the Parties shall file a joint proposed schedule within 21 days of the Court’s order.

1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION STAYING DEADLINES PENDING DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’
ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 13, 2023
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION STAYING DEADLINES PENDING DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’
ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION