Harrill v. Emanuel Medical Center et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/13/23 GRANTING #32 Stipulation and Plaintiff's deadline to respond to the Motion to dismiss shall be STAYED pending a decision on Defendants' anticipated motion for consolidation. (Licea Chavez, V)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4
5

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
STAYING DEADLINES PENDING
DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’
ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR
CONSOLIDATION

Plaintiff,

6
7

v.

8

EMANUEL MEDICAL CENTER, TENET
HEALTH, and META PLATFORMS, INC.,

9

Case No.: 2:23-cv-01672-TLN-CKD

JUDITH HARRILL, on Behalf of Herself
and All Others Similarly Situated,

Complaint Filing Date: August 10, 2023
Current Motion To Dismiss Response Date:
November 15, 2023
Current Deadline To File Joint Proposed
Case Schedule: November 15, 2023

Defendants.

10
11
12
13

On November 8, 2023, Plaintiff Judith Harrill (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Emanuel

14

Medical Center and Tenet Healthcare Corporation erroneously sued as Tenet Health (collectively,

15

“Defendants”) filed their Stipulation Staying Deadlines Pending Decision on Defendants’

16

Anticipated Motion for Consolidation (ECF 32).

17
18

The Court, having considered the Parties’ stipulation and finding good cause therefor,
hereby GRANTS the Stipulation and ORDERS as follows:

19

1. Plaintiff’s deadline to respond to the Motion to dismiss shall be stayed pending a

20

decision on Defendants’ anticipated motion for consolidation. Should this Court deny

21

consolidation, and/or a consolidated complaint is not necessitated by the Court’s order, Plaintiff

22

shall file her opposition to the pending Motion to Dismiss within 14 days of the Court’s order,

23

with Defendants’ reply due 14 days thereafter.

24

2. The Parties’ deadline to file a joint proposed case schedule shall be stayed pending

25

a decision on Defendants’ anticipated motion for consolidation.

26

consolidation, the Parties shall file a joint proposed schedule within 21 days of the Court’s order.

Should this Court deny

27
28

1
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION STAYING DEADLINES PENDING DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’
ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 13, 2023
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION STAYING DEADLINES PENDING DECISION ON DEFENDANTS’
ANTICIPATED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION