(SS) Miranda v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/2/2024 DENYING 12 Motion for Summary Judgment as MOOT and REMANDING to the Commissioner for Further Proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED. (Woodson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ROSINA MIRANDA,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
No. 2:23-cv-01811-DAD-JDP (SS)
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
14
ORDER GIVING EFFECT TO PARTIES’
STIPULATION AND REMANDING CASE
PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF
42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
(Doc. Nos. 12, 16)
15
On February 2, 2024, the parties filed a stipulation agreeing to remand this case for further
16
administrative action pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. No. 16.) The parties
17
agree that on remand, the Commissioner will offer plaintiff the opportunity for a hearing, develop
18
the record as necessary, and issue a new decision. (Id. at 2.)
Good cause appearing, and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this case is hereby
19
20
remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the
21
terms of the parties’ stipulation. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter final judgment in
22
favor of plaintiff, and against defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. In
23
addition, the pending motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 12) is hereby denied as having
24
been rendered moot by this order.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 2, 2024
DALE A. DROZD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?