Dickson v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Senior District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 05/31/2024 GRANTING 11 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal. Plaintiff's claims and complaint are hereby DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Murphy, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 8 9 10 11 GLENN DICKSON, individually, and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 14 15 16 ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 2:23-cv-01812-MCE-AC v. RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On August 24, 2023, Defendant Rheem Manufacturing removed this action from the County of Sacramento Superior Court. [Dkt. No. 1.] Shortly thereafter, the Parties informed the Court they would be attending mediation on April 2, 2024, and submitted a stipulation to stay the action and continue the deadlines for Defendant to respond to the Complaint and for Plaintiff to file a motion to remand until May 17, 2024; this Court granted the stipulation on September 6, 2023. [Dkt. No. 5.] On May 3, 2024, the Parties filed a Notice of Settlement, informing the Court that the Parties settled the matter at mediation on April 2, 2024 and were in the midst of satisfying their duties as mandated by the settlement agreement. On May 3, 2024, the Parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the class claims and stay the action pending dismissal of Plaintiff’s individual claims; this Court granted the stipulation on May 9, 2024, thereby dismissing the putative class claims. -1- ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) 1 Now pending before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal Pursuant to 2 F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), in which the Parties seek to dismiss Plaintiff’s individual claims and 3 complaint. Defendant has not responded to the Complaint and thus voluntary dismissal under 4 F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is appropriate. 5 6 Accordingly, the Parties’ joint stipulation to dismiss Plaintiff’s individual claims, with prejudice, is hereby GRANTED. Pursuant to the stipulation, the Court ORDERS the following: 7 (1) Plaintiff’s claims and complaint are HEREBY DISMISSED; 8 (2) each Party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs, except as provided in the 9 Settlement Agreement; and 10 (3) the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: May 31, 2024 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?