(PC) Nitkin v. Radu et al

Filing 35

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/4/2025 ORDERING plaintiff to show cause within 21 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within 21 days, an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant's motion. (Deputy Clerk RRB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA THOMAS NITKIN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 D. RADU, 15 Case No. 2:23-cv-1837-JDP (P) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Defendant. 16 17 18 On January 8, 2025, defendant filed a motion to compel. ECF No. 34. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response. 19 To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. 20 The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders 21 or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. 22 Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 23 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer 24 justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 25 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 26 I will give plaintiff a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for his 27 failure to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion. Plaintiff’s 28 failure to respond to this order will constitute a failure to comply with a court order and will result 1 1 in dismissal of this action. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one 2 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with 3 court orders. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within twenty-one 4 days, an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: March 4, 2025 JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?