(PC) Reed v. Flores et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/24/2024 ORDERING that, within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to 15 Motion to Dismiss. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ZAYA S. REED,

12

No. 2:23-cv-1876-CKD P
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J. FLORES, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

On April 23, 2024 defendants filed a partial motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint

18

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 15. Plaintiff has not opposed the

19

motion.

20

Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written

21

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to

22

the granting of the motion . . . .”

23

Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for

24

imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of

25

the Court.” In the order filed February 2, 2024, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with

26

the Local Rules might result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

27
28

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of
this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss. Failure to file an
1

1

opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation

2

that the motion be granted.

3

Dated: September 24, 2024
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

12/reed23cv1876.46.osc

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2