StoneX Commodity Solutions LLC v. High Caliber Transloading & Storage LLC et al

Filing 10

PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/13/2023 GRANTING 6 Application. ADDED Attorney Jane Pearson, PHV for StoneX Commodity Solutions LLC. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
Case 2:23-cv-01985-DB Document 6 Filed 10/06/23 Page 1 of 2 United States District Court Eastern District of California StoneX Commodity Solutions LLC, et al. Plaintiff(s) V. High Caliber Transloading & Storage LLC, etc Case Number: 2:23-cv-01985-DB APPLICATION FOR PRO HAC VICE AND PROPOSED ORDER Defendant(s) Pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(2) of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, JANE PEARSON hereby applies for permission to appear and participate as counsel in the above entitled action on behalf of the following party or parties: Plaintiff StoneX Commodity Solutions LLC f/k/a FCStone Merchant Services, LLC On 11/02/2982 (date), I was admitted to practice and presently in good standing in the State of Washington (Bar # 12785) (court). A certificate of good standing from that court is submitted in conjunction with this application. I have not been disbarred or formally censured by a court of record or by a state bar association; and there are not disciplinary proceedings against me. I have / ✔ I have not concurrently or within the year preceding this application made a pro hac vice application to this court. (If you have made a pro hac vice application to this court within the last year, list the name and case number of each matter in which an application was made, the date of application and whether granted or denied.) Date: 10/06/2023 Signature of Applicant: /s/ U.S. District Court – Pro Hac Vice Application Revised July 6, 2021 Jane Pearson Page 1 Case 2:23-cv-01985-DB Document 6 Filed 10/06/23 Page 2 of 2 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Applicant's Name: JANE PEARSON Law Firm Name: POLSINELLI PC Address: 1000 2nd Avenue, Suite 3500 City: Seattle WA State: Zip: 98104 Phone Number w/Area Code: (206) 393-5415 City and State of Residence: Bainbridge Island, WA Primary E-mail Address: jane.pearson@polsinelli.com Secondary E-mail Address: jane.pearson@janepearson.org I hereby designate the following member of the Bar of this Court who is registered for ECF with whom the Court and opposing counsel may readily communicate regarding the conduct of the case and upon whom electronic notice shall also be served via the Court’s ECF system: Local Counsel's Name: Tanya Behnam Law Firm Name: POLSINELLI LLP Address: 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2900 City: Los Angeles State: Phone Number w/Area Code: (310) 556-1801 CA Bar # Zip: 322593 90067 ORDER The Pro Hac Vice Application is APPROVED. The Pro Hac Vice Attorney is DIRECTED to request filing access through PACER. Dated: 11/13/2023 U.S. District Court – Pro Hac Vice Application Revised July 6, 2021 JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Page 2 Case 2:23-cv-01985-DB Document 6-1 Filed 10/06/23 Page 1 of 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF THE ADMISSION OF JANE ELIZABETH PEARSON TO PRACTICE IN THE COURTS OF THIS STATE ____________________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BAR NO. 12785 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING I, Sarah R. Pendleton, Deputy Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Washington, hereby certify JANE ELIZABETH PEARSON was regularly admitted to practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law in the Supreme Court and all the Courts of the State of Washington on November 2, 1982, and is now and has continuously since that date been an attorney in good standing, and has a current status of active. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of this Court on the 4th day of October, 2023. Sarah R. Pendleton Supreme Court Deputy Clerk Washington State Supreme Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?