(PS) People of the State of CA v. Maqaddem
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/02/24 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full and REMANDING this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court. CASE CLOSED (Licea Chavez, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiffs,
13
ORDER
v.
14
15
No. 2:23-cv-02123-TLN-CKD
LALA MAHA MAQADDEM,
Defendants.
16
17
Defendant, proceeding without counsel, removed this matter from the Los Angeles
18
19
Superior Court to this Court. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States
20
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On November 6, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,
21
22
which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed
23
within fourteen days. Defendant filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed this matter, the Court
26
finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 6, 2023 (ECF No. 6) are
3
ADOPTED IN FULL;
4
2. This action is REMANDED to the Los Angeles County Superior Court.
5
3.
The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a certified copy of the order remanding the
6
case on the Clerk of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, and to reference the
7
state case number SA098438 in the proof of service.
8
4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
9
Date: February 2, 2024
10
11
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?