(PS) People of the State of CA v. Maqaddem

Filing 21

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/02/24 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full and REMANDING this action to Los Angeles County Superior Court. CASE CLOSED (Licea Chavez, V)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14 15 No. 2:23-cv-02123-TLN-CKD LALA MAHA MAQADDEM, Defendants. 16 17 Defendant, proceeding without counsel, removed this matter from the Los Angeles 18 19 Superior Court to this Court. (ECF No. 1.) This matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On November 6, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein, 21 22 which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 23 within fourteen days. Defendant filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed this matter, the Court 26 finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 6, 2023 (ECF No. 6) are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; 4 2. This action is REMANDED to the Los Angeles County Superior Court. 5 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a certified copy of the order remanding the 6 case on the Clerk of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, and to reference the 7 state case number SA098438 in the proof of service. 8 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 9 Date: February 2, 2024 10 11 12 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?