Ramsey v. City of Rancho Cordova et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/13/2023 ORDERING that an Initial Scheduling Conference is SET for 2/2/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before 1/19/2024. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES RAMSEY,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:23-cv-2178 DAD DB

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA;
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

16

Defendants.

17
18

This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c) and 28

19

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for an Initial Scheduling Conference. (ECF No. 9.) Accordingly, IT IS

20

HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1. An Initial Scheduling Conference is set for Friday, February 2, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.

22

at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27

23

before the undersigned.

24
25

2. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before January 19, 2024. The joint
status report shall address all of the following matters:

26

a.

Progress of service of process;

27

b.

Possible joinder of additional parties;

28

c.

Possible amendment of the pleadings;
1

1

d.

Jurisdiction and venue;

2

e.

Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

3

f.

Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including
disclosure of expert witnesses;

g.

Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off
dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a
final pretrial conference and trial;

h.

Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules
due to the relative simplicity or complexity of the action;

i.

Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in
bankruptcy;

j.

Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned
to this matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any
disqualification by virtue of her so acting, or whether they prefer to
have a Settlement Conference before another magistrate judge;

k.

Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United
States Magistrate Judge; and

l.

Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious
disposition of this action.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

3. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear at the

16

scheduling conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local Rules

17

110 and 183.

18

DATED: November 13, 2023

19

/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2