(SS) Skidgel v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/28/2024 EXTENDING the defendants response to the 11 Motion for Summary Judgment to 4/28/24. (Woodson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
MATHEW W. PILE
Associate General Counsel
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
CASPAR CHAN, CSBN 294804
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Telephone: 510-970-4810
Facsimile: 415-744-0134
Email: Caspar.Chan@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
YVONNE SKIDGEL,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
) Civil No. 2:23-cv-02179-KJM-EFB
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND
)
) BRIEFING SCHEDULE
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
The parties stipulate through counsel that Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (the
“Commissioner”), shall have an extension of 30 days to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment in this case. In support of this request, the Commissioner respectfully states as follows:
1.
The Commissioner’s response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is due March
29, 2024. Defendant has not previously received an extension of this deadline.
2.
Plaintiff has raised an argument regarding the longstanding principle of Chevron
deference based on a pair of cases pending before the United States Supreme Court. Because Chevron
deference is fundamental to the Social Security disability framework, Counsel for the Commissioner is
in the process of consulting with management and senior attorneys within the agency regarding the
defensibility of this issue, as well as any response as appropriate.
3.
Counsel for the Commissioner has consulted with Plaintiff’s counsel who advised that he
has no objections.
4.
This request is made in good faith and is not intended to unnecessarily delay the
proceedings in this matter.
WHEREFORE, Defendant requests until April 28, 2024, to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Summary Judgment.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Date: March 28, 2024
PRATO & REICHMAN, APC
By:
/s/ Caspar Chan for Justin Prato*
JUSTIN PRATO
*Authorized by email on March 28, 2024
Attorneys for Plaintiff
////
////
////
////
////
////
////
////
////
////
////
///
1
2
Date: March 28, 2024
PHILIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
Eastern District of California
3
4
By:
5
6
/s/ Caspar Chan
CASPAR CHAN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2024
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?