(PS )Brown v. Roseville City School District et al
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 10/23/2024 ADOPTING 24 Findings and Recommendations IN FULL; GRANTING 19 Motion to Dismiss ; and DISMISSING this action with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Lopez, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID BROWN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
v.
ORDER
ROSEVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT,
et al.,
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action without counsel. The matter was referred to
17
18
No. 2:23-cv-02256 DJC CKD
a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).
On August 9, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
19
20
herein which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and
21
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
22
objections. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and
23
recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s
24
analysis.
25
////
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The August 9, 2024 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 24) are
3
adopted in full;
4
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 19) is granted;
5
3. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and
6
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 23, 2024
Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?