(PS) Douglas v. Warner Brothers Films
Filing
5
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 02/02/24 ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING Plaintiff's Complaint without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED (Licea Chavez, V)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AN JON MARQUIS DOUGLAS,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:23-cv-02320-TLN-CKD
v.
ORDER
WARNER BROTHERS FILMS,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. This matter was referred to a
17
18
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On December 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
20
which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed
21
within fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.) The time to file objection has passed, and Plaintiff did not
22
file objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
23
24
Court conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed this matter, the Court
25
finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 28, 2023 (ECF No. 4) are
ADOPTED IN FULL;
4
2. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and
5
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
6
Date: February 2, 2024
7
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?